ES / EN
- May 29, 2025 -
No Result
View All Result
OnCubaNews
  • World
  • Cuba
  • Cuba-USA
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Infographic
  • Culture
    • Billboard
  • Sports
  • Styles / Trends
  • Media
  • Special
  • Cuban Flavors
  • World
  • Cuba
  • Cuba-USA
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Infographic
  • Culture
    • Billboard
  • Sports
  • Styles / Trends
  • Media
  • Special
  • Cuban Flavors
OnCubaNews
ES / EN
Home World

Aurelio Alonso on the Pope: “Francis as a name meant a lot from the beginning”

While the decision is being made as to who will succeed Jorge Bergoglio as head of the Catholic Church and the sign of the new pontificate, Alonso evokes the pope “of the greatest openness in the history of the Church.”

by
  • Rafael Hernández
    Rafael Hernández
May 4, 2025
in World
0
View of Pope Francis’s tomb in the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome. Photo: EFE/Vatican Press/Francesco Sforza.

View of Pope Francis’s tomb in the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome. Photo: EFE/Vatican Press/Francesco Sforza.

In the field of religious studies, no one has carried out more systematic, diverse, and sustained work on the Catholic Church than Aurelio Alonso.

From his first texts in the mid-1960s on Catholic philosophical thought in Europe and his debates with Monsignor Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, through his university courses during the years of dominant atheism, when I was his student, to his reflections on faith in Cuba and Latin America in the 1990s and 2000s, when I had the opportunity to be his editor, I learned that no one understood as he did the keys to the complex relationship between Church and State, and the place of the Catholic faith in Cuban culture, society and politics.

For more than half a century, I have turned to him, seeking to unravel the intricacies of ecclesiastical politics, here and around the world. In order to understand the papacy of Francis in its context, its meaning, outcome, and future, I have burst into the peace of his spiritual retreat, resuming the thread of a conversation where the human and the divine come together. 

Ten years ago, in a conversation about the scope of Pope Francis, you commented on the significance of the fact that he would have been the first Latin American pope; and also that he was a Jesuit, in the context of two previous papacies with a rather conservative character. You described him that way at the time. How do you see the balance of what you thought then, in terms of what a new moment in the Church represented, ten years later?

The fact that Francis was Latin American and a Jesuit were two absolute novelties in the history of the papacy. But neither of those reasons alone meant that he would be a progressive pope, either because he was a Jesuit or because he was Latin American. In fact, the majority of the Latin American cardinalate was conservative, aligned with papal decisions that sought closeness and affinity.

It’s important to remember, every time there is a conclave, that those who elect the next pope are, for the most part, cardinals who were appointed by the outgoing pope. This pope cannot create cardinals who only think like him; he also appoints them taking into account the dominant projections in the churches from which those cardinals come.

Related Posts

April 23, 2025, photo of U.S. President Donald Trump signing executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House. Photo: EFE/EPA/Samuel Corum/Pool.

The ups and downs of the humanitarian parole

April 30, 2025
A screen shows the fall of the Dow Jones Industrial Average at the close of trading at the New York Stock Exchange in New York, USA, on April 4, 2025. Photo: Justin Lane/EFE/EPA.

Trump calls on Americans to “hang tough” and says his tariffs are an “economic revolution”

April 7, 2025
Donald Trump shows the first executive orders. Photo: EFE.

One month under Trump: the reign of executive orders

February 21, 2025
The president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, during her usual morning press conference at the National Palace in Mexico City. Photo: EFE/Isaac Esquivel.

Sheinbaum defends “opening the door” to Cuban doctors in Mexico

February 20, 2025

Currently, as Frei Betto points out in a recent article, Africa is the region where Pope Francis has appointed the most cardinals, reflecting the growth of Catholicism in Africa in recent decades, a growth greater than that of Latin America. However, the Pope has had to consider the composition and projections of the bishops of the local episcopal conferences so as not to appoint cardinals they might reject, which could generate conflicts within the Church. And it is not expected that he do anything like that.

So, according to Frei Betto — who knows far more than I do — the cardinals appointed in Africa are mostly conservative, and many of them are quite distant from the projections the Pope has shown. Nor can we say that Pope Francis was a completely anti-conservative figure. 

I had made some predictions in other interviews prior to the one you mention, and also in an article published by Casa de las Américas magazine just after the conclave, when there was doubt about whether he would be a progressive pope or not. Because local situations had arisen in Argentina that led some to think of him as a figure linked to the dictatorship, in its final stages. But since the pope was elected, in that Vatican “democracy” exercised by 115 cardinals in 2013, he decided to call himself Francis.

It should be noted that no pope, until now, had chosen to be called Francis. Throughout the long history of the papacy, names like Leo, Gregory, or John, among others, have abounded. But never had a pontiff opted for the name of the humble Francis of Assisi, the one who challenged the institutional structures that the Church had consolidated during the Middle Ages. Francis founded an order that rejected the traditional monastery model and replaced it with the convent: not a center of feudal power, but a halfway house. A space from which the monk, far from living in seclusion, went forth to preach by his example of poverty and humility.

That choice of the name Francis for a pope meant a lot to me from the beginning, as did all the gestures of breaking with the luxury of papal pomp, which he maintained until the end of his life. Even the decision not to be buried in a crypt of St. Peter’s Basilica, but in the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore, a place outside the tradition of papal pomp, was a clear sign of that break. And the simple funeral was also important. I think all this shows how this pope became closer to the poor and the problems of the world.

I would like to return to that 2015 interview, to two challenges within the Church: fraudulent dealings and forms of corruption associated with the sexual conduct of priests; as well as the need for new policies to address these accumulated problems. To what extent can the balance of Francis’s work be connected to your assessments at the time?

It’s very difficult to make a judgment on this without being, to a certain extent, deeply involved in the Church’s problems. Seen from the outside, everything indicates that Francis managed, with his projection, to attenuate or diminish — I don’t know if he eliminated — the problems of corruption, both in the moral, personal and human sense, and with regard to the violation of the vow of chastity, as well as sexual abuse. I don’t think it’s something that can be completely eradicated institutionally. However, it must be acknowledged that he faced these problems without hesitation, without a single muscle trembling in his face. But as long as celibacy exists, there will be motivations for sexual abuse and for distortions of the ethical sense of the Church’s pastoral.

Everything indicates, seen from the outside, that if the Pope didn’t manage to eliminate them, he did attenuate them considerably. The serious financial corruption scandals have also been brought under control. Without looking at it from the inside in their entirety, it’s impossible to know whether what has taken place is an overcoming of these problems or a masking, which he himself may have missed, or to what extent there is one or the other. And it may manifest itself again with a more relaxed policy within the Vatican. It’s very difficult or impossible to predict from the outside. But I think that, among the positive things left by Francis’s papacy, is a certain improvement, at least apparent, of these problems. In addition to others, some more important.

A better understanding of the connection between the political and the social, with the ethical, with the human, as well as a different policy toward nature, one that confronts the blunders committed by humanity against the environment. A whole range of problems on which the Pope’s position has had a positive outcome. I would say “balance,” because there have also been times when the Pope has tried to strike a balance. A very Jesuit style, too. 

General view of Pope Francis’ funeral in St. Peter’s Square on Saturday, April 26, 2025. Photo: EFE/Vatican Media/Simone Risoluti.

You mentioned the issue of celibacy. There’s also the Church’s attitude toward the LGBTIQ+ community and toward women’s access to positions previously reserved for priests. Regarding this, to what extent has Francis’s papacy advanced different positions?

I don’t know to what extent these advances are simply rhetorical or truly profound. For example, the appointment of some women to positions or tasks within the Curia does not necessarily imply that an irreversible space for female participation has been opened.

Even so, it is significant that Pope Francis appointed, a couple of months ago, Sister Simona Brambilla as Prefect of the Dicastery for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life. And, a little earlier, Sister Raffaella Petrini as Governor of Vatican City State, an important, if more administrative, position in which the Curia would have been unlikely to mount any opposition to block it.

On the other hand, in his later years, he appointed Sister Natalie Becquart as the first Undersecretary of the Synod of Bishops, the Pope’s advisory body. She would also become the first voting member of a Catholic synod composed of bishops, priests, and some religious people.

Regarding the LGBTQ+ community, it is true that the Pope showed signs of tolerance; he recognized the legitimacy of their demands, even if he did not support gay marriage. He did not go that far, and perhaps it was premature. Nor do I dare to judge whether, for the balance he has tried to leave of his pontificate and for continuity, it would have been viable.

Now, our eyes must be focused on what will happen, on how the Curia’s election will be, how this conclave will work. It will be extremely important.

Let’s move on to the question of the conclave and the election of the next pope.

According to Frei Betto, it will most likely be an Italian again, after almost half a century.

In the best-case scenario.

In the best-case scenario. According to Frei Betto, it is in Italy where there is a higher proportion of cardinals, among the six newly appointed by Francis; five closely reflect his views. There is also talk of the famous British Dominican Timothy Radcliffe, a theologian very close to his positions.

Who is of an advanced age.

I don’t know if the British cardinal is a theologian of Benedict XVI’s stature, but at least to me, he doesn’t seem so conspicuous a figure that I would think he’s a papal candidate. He’s also a cardinal of a religious order, that is, a Dominican. Normally, Curia are defined by priests of diocesan origin, not religious orders.

I don’t think it’s likely they’ll elect such a young pope, like some candidates from Australia or India, who are under 50. Doing so would mean committing the Church to a pontificate that could last two decades, and that’s too long.

Do you mean the Church tends to prefer papacies that can last no more than ten years?

I think so; the Church seems to be moving in that direction. And if there’s no agreement, the papacy could be even shorter, seeking what’s called a transitional pope, someone who has a great deal of consensus in the Council, but who doesn’t compromise a long pontificate.

“He marked the history of the Church and of humanity”: a look at Francis from within Cuban Catholicism

Finally, I suggest returning to Francis’s relationship with Cuba, which we discussed in that 2015 conversation. At that time, the normalization process between Cuba and the United States was underway with the Obama administration. As you pointed out, he played an active role in the negotiation process that led to that agreement, paving the way for a normalization process. How was Francis’s relationship with Cuba?

From a political perspective, I believe his relationship with Cuba was the boldest and most positive act he ever took.

Remember that after his first visit, he returned to Cuba, passing through here on a sort of technical stopover, which he took advantage of to meet with the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, a decisive moment in improving relations between the two churches. On that occasion, he expressed very positive words toward Cuba. He was also the pope of ecumenism, toward the Protestant churches, the Orthodox Church, and other faiths around the world; and even of ecumenism toward the non-believing population.

In general, Francis was a very open pope. If you press me, I’d say he was the most open pope in the history of the Church. Because John Paul II was a pope of renewal, but as someone said, he was a conservative reformer. He wasn’t a progressive man, not even close.

As for Benedict, I think he started out somewhat different, and while I wouldn’t dare say he ended up progressive, he did realize the limitations and vulnerability a pope can have when the Curia is not favorable to him. He realized that, although John Paul II valued him greatly as a theologian, the rest of the curial apparatus didn’t accept many of his opinions and decisions.

So he chose to find a way out in time, and he did it with tremendous grace. Because he was a brilliant theologian, but also a man who knew the workings of the Church like no one else.

Photo: Kaloian.

Although the two previous popes, Wojtyła and Ratzinger, visited Cuba, Francis was exceptionally visible in his effort to find a solution to the Cuban problem. Because relations between Cuba and the United States involve both parties, but we’re talking about the Cuban problem. And Cuba isn’t so much a problem for the United States as the United States is for Cuba, really.

So Francis took a significant step in contributing to the solution to the Cuban problem. He also had a cardinal who, although not appointed by him, worked in concert with his pontificate: Jaime Ortega. And we must also recognize the positive impact of Ortega’s cardinalate in this regard.

Thank you, Aurelio, for this interview. It has been an opportunity to reflect on fundamental issues we shared ten years ago, and to delve into other equally complex ones, with the lucidity and subtlety of that time. Perhaps more so, I would say. A brilliant opportunity.

[Laughs] Thank you.

  • Rafael Hernández
    Rafael Hernández
Tags: featuredPope Francis
Previous Post

Katapulk and deCancio Foods: A biweekly raffle bringing flavor and joy to Cuban families

Next Post

Papushi: the Cuban king of Tex-Mex

Rafael Hernández

Rafael Hernández

Politólogo, profesor, escritor. Autor de libros y ensayos sobre EEUU, Cuba, sociedad, historia, cultura. Dirige la revista Temas.

Next Post
Papushi. Photo: Taken from his Facebook profile.

Papushi: the Cuban king of Tex-Mex

Archbishop of Havana proclaimed cardinal by Pope Francis in 2019. Photo: CNS/Paul Haring.

Cuban Cardinal before the conclave: “There is a desire to maintain the legacy of Pope Francis”

Heidy Sánchez speaks to OnCuba where she is staying in Havana. Photo: Otmaro Rodríguez.

Deported and without her baby daughter: Heidy Sánchez’s desperation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

The conversation here is moderated according to OnCuba News discussion guidelines. Please read the Comment Policy before joining the discussion.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Read

  • Solar panel on the roof of Carlos Carcell’s home in Marianao. Photo: Courtesy of Kjell Ove Hatlem

    Solar panels and private sector: hope on rooftops

    19 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • The Enchanted Shrimp of the Cuban Dance

    2988 shares
    Share 1195 Tweet 747
  • Admission to higher education in Cuba: within everyone’s reach or an illusion of equity?

    4 shares
    Share 2 Tweet 1
  • Marylin Monroe and Afro-Americans

    589 shares
    Share 236 Tweet 147
  • What foods can be brought to Cuba and what imports are forbidden?

    1970 shares
    Share 788 Tweet 493

Most Commented

  • “Pingueros en la Habana “: a revealing study on male prostitution in Cuba

    42 shares
    Share 17 Tweet 11
  • Cuban tourism: more than honor at stake

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7
  • Solar panels and private sector: hope on rooftops

    19 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • About us
  • Work with OnCuba
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy for comments
  • Contact us
  • Advertisement offers

OnCuba and the OnCuba logo are registered® trademarks of Fuego Enterprises, Inc., its subsidiaries or divisions.
OnCuba © by Fuego Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • World
  • Cuba
  • Cuba-USA
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Infographic
  • Culture
    • Billboard
  • Sports
  • Styles / Trends
  • Media
  • Special
  • Cuban Flavors

OnCuba and the OnCuba logo are registered® trademarks of Fuego Enterprises, Inc., its subsidiaries or divisions.
OnCuba © by Fuego Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}