ES / EN
- May 9, 2025 -
No Result
View All Result
OnCubaNews
  • World
  • Cuba
  • Cuba-USA
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Infographic
  • Culture
    • Billboard
  • Sports
  • Styles / Trends
  • Media
  • Special
  • Cuban Flavors
  • World
  • Cuba
  • Cuba-USA
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Infographic
  • Culture
    • Billboard
  • Sports
  • Styles / Trends
  • Media
  • Special
  • Cuban Flavors
OnCubaNews
ES / EN
Home Cuba Society Politics in Cuba

The death penalty and the Cuban Constitution

by
  • Rodolfo Alpízar
    Rodolfo Alpízar,
  • rodolfo_alpizar
    rodolfo_alpizar
September 23, 2018
in Politics in Cuba
0

In my opinion, a humanist and modern constitution that follows Martí’s ideas should forbid the deal penalty in all cases. The truth is that many citizens consider that it should exist, but that it be applied in exceptional cases. That it be forbidden would be the right thing and we should head toward that; that it be allowed but with multiple restrictions that almost annul it could be a step in that direction. No matter which, what is inadmissible is that the Constitution ignore a matter that concerns the first of all human rights.

It is amazing that the subject was not in the content of the Constitution of 1976. Even more amazing is that it does not appear in the draft of the new Constitution.

When on May 20, 1902 Cuba was born as a Republic before the world, its constitution referred to the death penalty, and it was expressly forbidden to apply it for political crimes. That of 1940, an example for its time, as we know, in its article 25 stated:

The death penalty cannot be imposed. The members of the Armed Forced are exempted from military crimes as well as the persons guilty of treason or espionage in favor of the enemy in times of war with a foreign nation.

A few days after his coup d’état, Fulgencio Batista imposed on April 4, 1953 the Constitutional Statutes, where the validity of the Constitution of 1940 was abolished and the death penalty was reinstated for cases involving gangsters and gunmen.

That is, the death penalty was reinstated in republican Cuba in 1952, as a consequence of the coup d’état in which Fulgencio Batista became the owner of the Republic’s destinies. The concept englobed in the expression “involving gangsters and gunmen” was wide ranging and allowed its interpretation according to conveniences.

The Fundamental Law of 1959, although it repeated the 1940 prohibition of the death penalty, added a long list of exceptions; that is: cases in which it could be applied:

Related Posts

LGTBI flag in Havana

“Hx” and power

May 25, 2024
Havanas. Painting of Che Guevara. Cuba

Looking at Cuba: thirty years later

May 27, 2023
Cuban flag.

Politics, discourses and the logic of the real

May 13, 2023
Photo: Kaloian

Cuba in new cold war: three scenarios

May 7, 2023

Article 25. The death penalty cannot be imposed. The cases of the members of the Armed Forces, of the repressive agencies of the Tyranny, of the auxiliary groups organized by it, of the armed groups privately organized to defend it and of the informants, for crimes committed in favor of the reinstatement or defense of the Tyranny overthrown on December 31, 1958 are exempted. The persons guilty of treason or of subversion of constitutional order or of espionage in favor of the enemy in times of war with a foreign nation are also exempted.

Meanwhile, the Constitution of 1976 ignored referring to the subject, and its 1992 reform also overlooked it. Thus a juridical limbo was created, since with the Constitution of 1976 the Fundamental Law and its mention of the death penalty stopped being valid. This gave rise to interpretations accommodated to casuistry. For example, the 1987 Penal Code affirmatively interprets the constitutional silence, and declares as valid the death penalty, while in its article 29.1 it expressed that “it has an exceptional character.”

That is, for lack of a constitutional pronouncement, regarding this the creators of the regulation were guided by their own convictions.

Neither does the current draft of the new Constitution mention the death penalty. If the text is approved as it is, the death penalty in Cuba would not be allowed or forbidden. The juridical limbo would continue. The legislators would continue being free to interpret the silence in their way.

A Constitution that proclaims in its chapter 1 the humanism and repeatedly recalls Martí’s teachings cannot obviate a penalty that concerns the principal of the human rights, that of life, and leave it to the interpretation of three persons, fallible by definition (in a five-member court, the vote of three is sufficient to make a decision).

In no case should the death penalty be applied, not in Cuba or in any other part of the world. Whoever thinks that it is a sort of vaccine against horrific crimes overlooks that, until today, the existence of the death penalty has not made bloody crimes decrease in the countries that apply it. And, on the contrary, many places that apply it are among those with the highest crime rates.

The death penalty is the only one that is not reversible. If a minute after it is applied it is discovered there was a mistake, it is impossible to bring back to life the innocent “executed man.”

If by majority of the National Assembly it is decided that the Constitution not forbid the death penalty, Cuba would lose a good opportunity to be on a par with modernity.

If that happens, at least it should be guaranteed that the exceptionality be total. For example, by virtue of the irreversibility that characterizes that penalty, it should be expressly forbidden that some of the formalities established for its imposition be overlooked. Skipping stages in the process under the pretext of “punishing” or “creating a precedent” or simply “by virtue of the seriousness of the cases” cannot be justified. That is, the application of the death penalty as a result of a summary or very summary trial cannot be allowed.

On the other hand, it is well established in jurisprudence that the maximum penalty established in the penal code is not applied in the case of a crime committed in a tentative degree; however, history is full of capital punishment sentences in which in the end the crime was not committed and, therefore, it was not punishable with the maximum sanction, death.

Therefore, if the death penalty has to remain in Cuba, that it at least be done with the maximum of formality, without haste and, above all, that it never be applied again if the crime doesn’t get to be committed.

  • Rodolfo Alpízar
    Rodolfo Alpízar,
  • rodolfo_alpizar
    rodolfo_alpizar
Tags: cubaCuban Constitutioncuban societydeath penalty in Cuba
Previous Post

Billboard: Cubadisco on front line

Next Post

Cuban scientists hold talks in U.S. about “attacks”

Rodolfo Alpízar

Rodolfo Alpízar

rodolfo_alpizar

rodolfo_alpizar

Next Post
Cuban scientists hold exchanges in the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, in Washington, about the health damages suffered by U.S. diplomats in Havana.

Cuban scientists hold talks in U.S. about “attacks”

Former President Barack Obama goes to give a speech in Paris, on December 2, 2017. He was one of the users most highlighted on Twitter in 2017. (AP Photo/Thibault Camus, File)

Obama, the comeback

Photo: Ismario Rodríguez Pérez

Cuban nostalgia a la Juan Padrón

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

The conversation here is moderated according to OnCuba News discussion guidelines. Please read the Comment Policy before joining the discussion.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Read

  • Archbishop of Havana proclaimed cardinal by Pope Francis in 2019. Photo: CNS/Paul Haring.

    Cuban Cardinal before the conclave: “There is a desire to maintain the legacy of Pope Francis”

    32 shares
    Share 13 Tweet 8
  • The Enchanted Shrimp of the Cuban Dance

    2927 shares
    Share 1171 Tweet 732
  • Tourism in Cuba: a driving force in decline

    25 shares
    Share 10 Tweet 6
  • Deported and without her baby daughter: Heidy Sánchez’s desperation

    8 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 2
  • Poverty in Cuba: Ministry of Labor establishes new regulations to care for “vulnerable groups”

    11 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 3

Most Commented

  • Photovoltaic solar park in Cuba. Photo: Taken from the Facebook profile of the Electricity Conglomerate (UNE).

    Solar parks vs. blackouts: between illusions and reality (I)

    15 shares
    Share 6 Tweet 4
  • Fernando Pérez, a traveler

    11 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 3
  • Solar parks vs. blackouts: between illusions and reality (II and end)

    13 shares
    Share 5 Tweet 3
  • The “Pan de La Habana” has arrived

    31 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 8
  • China positions itself as Cuba’s main medical supplier after signing new contracts

    26 shares
    Share 10 Tweet 7
  • About us
  • Work with OnCuba
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy for comments
  • Contact us
  • Advertisement offers

OnCuba and the OnCuba logo are registered® trademarks of Fuego Enterprises, Inc., its subsidiaries or divisions.
OnCuba © by Fuego Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • World
  • Cuba
  • Cuba-USA
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Infographic
  • Culture
    • Billboard
  • Sports
  • Styles / Trends
  • Media
  • Special
  • Cuban Flavors

OnCuba and the OnCuba logo are registered® trademarks of Fuego Enterprises, Inc., its subsidiaries or divisions.
OnCuba © by Fuego Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}